Gore goes, Lott lurches.
So I take a four-day J1Thing weekend to meet some real deadlines -- and two southern politicians create a smorgasbord for the blogosphere. Not much left to chew on, alas, but let me nibble at what remains.
Most of the Gore coverage fails to mention that 2004 is the second challenging race the former Veep has sat out. In 1992, he took a pass on running against Bush 41, saying he had to tend to his family, which was then contending with his son's serious injury. (Disclosure 1: I used to work for Gore -- and on most days, he's someone I like and admire. Disclosure 2: I haven't read much of the coverage, so some other genius may have already made this point.) The charitable view of this pattern is that Gore is a guy who isn't obsessed with being President when gaining the office means punishing his family or himself. The less charitable view is that Gore is a guy who ducks tough races. The marginally charitable view is that there's nothing wrong with the less charitable view.
Also, here's a prediction: Within three days, we'll see a "Gore as Nixon" news analysis: The awkward VP of a golf-playing Prez who presided over fat and happy times loses to a son of privilege in a race of dubious fairness. The pretender to the throne takes office--but a cataclysm (JFK's assassination, Sept. 11) catapults the sitting President (LBJ, GWB) to invincible status, making the next presidential election a blowout. But said popular president over-reaches (Vietnam, TBD), prodding the awkward former Vice President out of hiding and into the Presidency eight years after his initial loss.
As for Lott, well, he's a liar. Or a hypocrite. Or both. Yesterday, he said he's all for affirmative action. Huh? In 1991, Lott supported an amendment by North Carolina Senator Jesse Helms that called for prohibiting private employers from using affirmative action procedures for recruiting black workers. In 1998 Lott voted to eliminate a set-aside program for minority-owned businesses on federal construction projects. And that's just two examples I found in 30 seconds of Google-ing. Lott's always been against affirmative action. Nothing wrong with that. Many principled people have made a principled case against racial preference in various realms. But for a guy who's on record supposedly in support of these principles to abandon those principles as soon as his job is in jeopardy is despicable. Unlike Al Gore, Trent Lott will do or say anything to keep power.